Waiting for a kingfisher and meeting a wading deer by Arne Bischoff

A young Roe deer wading the knee-deep Oder river.

Just be out there! This is the no. 1 lesson, every wildlife photographer needs to learn. It’s often a bit wearisome. Not to sleep in, to set out in the dark only to be out at the break of day, to wait endless hours to be - more often than not - unsuccessful in terms of taking images. But it’s worth it. I never regretted getting out, even when I saw no animals at all. And sometimes it just pays off other than you planned or expected.

Checking the best spot to climb the steep and busy bank.

A few days ago, I set out to photograph the beautiful and well beloved kingfisher. It is quite shy, so you need a plan and a good disguise and a lot of patience. I made for a local stream which still runs quite naturally. It offers clear, not too deep waters and high banks that provide the kingfisher with nesting holes in summertime.

I lay in camouflage under a carved out high river bank, fully overshadowed and rarely visible. I waited for the kingfisher to show up downstream, from where I already had heard it’s call. I was concentrated searching and listening, when suddenly in my back, I heard really loud splashing sounds.

I could not really believe what I saw: A young roe deer waded downstream. It was focussed on the difficult walking and did not notice me at all, until it was about ten meters close. When it finally heard the shutter clicking, it stooped and watched me intently. I did not move and so the little deer decided that I was no risk. It continued its path and made slowly for the northern bank. It passed me with less than five meters distance. An amazing experience and a breathtaking moment!

I later figured out, what probably happened. The roe deer wanted to cross the river to make for the thick and sheltering bushes there. It left the shallow southern bank, but must have had some difficulties to climb the steeper and higher northern bank (where the kingfisher nests). So it chose to wade the only knee-deep rivulet downstream, to find an easier spot to climb. Once it was safe out of the water, it slowly disappeared in the bushes.

Finally: Safely hidden in the thick bushes.

A finch feast by Arne Bischoff

A tree full of finches.

I am lucky. Around my town, the EU Interreg Partridge Project planted a lot of wildflower patches. The patches provide the highly endangered Grey partridge with shelter and food. But the gallinaceous birds are not the only ones who love their wildflowers.

One very agreeable quality of those finches is that they form mixed finch flocks.

In late fall, thousand of finches feasted on the wildflower seeds. Greenfinches, Bullfinches, Chaffinches, Hawfinches and Goldfinches roamed the area in huge numbers. They live together, they eat together, they migrate together - well at least some. Of course they sometimes quarrel for food. They especially love the last remaining sunflower seeds. So they tend to sit right on top of the sunflowers and albeit being very social in general they are not happy to have other finches on their sunflowers.

Speaking of quarrels: The occasional fighting finches were not the only ones who got a bit heated during my last visit. A Common kestrel was around hunting and a Carrion Crow was just not having it. The Crow constantly bullied the kestrel until the bird of prey finally gave in and made way. I really like Corvidae for this quality. They are incredibly clever, they are great flyers and they don’t accept birds of prey around. The kestrel finally went hunting somewhere else.

No Muskoxen in Gränslandet by Arne Bischoff

A lonely tree between fjäll and forest

Ten days solo-trekking in Swedish/Norwegian gränslandet.

Beautiful autumnal colours above the Storån

Due to the global Covid-19 pandemic I had to change my plans for my outdoor- and wilderness-holidays. I originally planned to go to Norwegian Dovrefjell and photograph Muskoxen during their rutting season and enjoy the gorgeous autumnal colours. I wanted to meet my close friend and best tour companion Linn up there. But Norway imposed a mandatory ten-days quarantine for travellers from Germany. That foiled all my plans. Norwegian Femundsmarka has always been my plan b for this fall and with this equally impossible, I had to quickly find an alternative. It turned out to be Gränslandet and it turned out to be solo hiking, because my friend wasn’t allowed to go to Sweden without undergoing a quarantine back home in Norway, too.

On the edge of Töfsingdalen national park

Getting there

As the name suggests, Swedish Gränslandet is a wilderness on both sides of the Norwegian/Swedish border with scraggy mountains, deep forests, endless bogs and the wild and pathless Töfsingdalen national park quite in the middle. It is a little lesser known than Norwegian Femundsmarka some kilometres further west, but they are literally two sides of the same coin.
And thus, it went. I made the 1,500-kilometre travel exclusively by car due to the pandemic and used only the Scandlines ferry from Puttgarden to Rødby in the process, spending the entire 45 minutes alone on deck. With every kilometre further north, my anticipation rose. Both fall and bird winter-migration was in full swing.

Being where I love to be - the Scandinavian fjell

I started my hike in the little mountain town of Grövelsjön. The first day saw me crossing typical scraggy fjell-terrain before I descended into what seems typical for the region. I went along river Storån which forms a lot of lesser lakes. It is all very wet, boggy, wild. The paths are not easy to walk at all, typical Scandinavian fjell with roots, puddles, boulders all over the place. The colours have been nothing short of breath-taking. From the deep green fir trees over bright and dark yellow, vibrant oranges to really dark reds. I quickly crossed into the pathless Töfsingdalen national park before I returned to follow river Storån. There are some really cosy shelters along the way, but I relied on my tent for the first few days. Then something happened that I had not foreseen. I fell in love.

Falling in love with a hut

I came across a very beautiful little hut. It was as if it was calling me to stay. I felt an urgent desire to follow its call and it did not disappoint me. My friend Linn, who has been obliged to stay at home booked it for me and send me the PIN for the key-safe (a typical Scandinavian thing). For two days I did little but enjoying coffee, watching the vast numbers of migrating Ring ouzels and the ever-present and very talkative Whooper swans. One unforgettable moment I saw six Ravens playing together in the air. And I saw my first ever specimen of Siberian jay and Northern hawk-owl. But I pretty much fell in love with the whoopers. Did you know that they not only dabble, but feast on blueberries? I want to have such a hut. Being there fed my escapism big-time. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as those little mountain-huts here in Germany.

Sunset at the border of Töfsingdalen national park

The swift running river Hågåån

Jottuslättan and Hågåån

When I continued my journey, I headed for the region of Juttuslätten. Very few people ever come here – this was what everyone said before and that sounded very promising. Unfortunately, I never made it there. I found a very beautiful little path to Ytre Hågåsjön. Maybe this was the best day of my journey. I found bear-tracks and a herd wild reindeer accompanied me for a kilometre or two. From Ytre Hågåsjön I went down the river Hågåån to find the crossing that the map promised. After two kilometres of rather demanding and pathless walking along the river I came to a huge manmade clearing in the otherwise dense forest. A little up the river a bridge had been torn down by the power of the running water. I took about two hours two scout the river for a crossing, but I finally decided not to cross. The river was running swift and at least waist-deep, maybe higher and I had no crossing-shoes with me, because I did not plan to do challenging crosses. All in all, the water was to deep and swift-running to do it barefoot and I did not want to do the rest of the trip in soaking wet hiking boots.

This has been quite a bummer. I spent the night there, walked down the Hågåån valley until it met the Storån again and then continued north and around the Töfsingdalen national park again. My final stage took me over the regions highest and very windy peak of Storvätteshågna.

The definition of freedom

A photographers problems with the wilderness

It has been an incredible trip. I would have loved to be out a little longer, but it had not been possible for personal reasons. I only met two people in all this time. Wonderful. And I re-learned a lesson that I learned some years ago in the Sarek and that I had forgotten. Photography and ambitious hiking or trekking don’t go hand in hand. Walking in such a landscape is a thing of its own. I personally don’t really find the peace of mind and time to concentrate on photography, when I am walking with a heavy pack. But photography needs this. Time, patience, focus. So, I did not take to many images of all what Gränslandet had to offer. Breath-taking autumnal colours, beautiful and swift rivers, wildlife, wind, rain, trees, mountains, forests, bogs, but most of all silence, peace, freedom.

Of Mice and Men by Arne Bischoff

A good thing such a garden.

I am a garden caretaker right now, watching a friends little garden. I ate a lot of gooseberries and raspberries and harvested some salad and zucchini. A good thing such a garden.

And I made friends with this little guy who was not at all shy. One wonderful evening I lay in front of this sage bush and watched my friend eat. It did not care at all and allowed me about twenty centimeters close. And now I am a little in love with a mouse.

So please, do me a favor. Stop killing mice. They are part of your ecosystem as well as your well beloved foxes or squirrels.

What's the story? (Furry glory). A badger in the woods. by Arne Bischoff

I made a new friend. He’s furry, he is black, white and grey and he makes such wonderful sniffing sounds.

A European badger (Meles meles) in the twilight of its woods.

There is this big thing in the photography community: INSPIRATION. I can’t quite suffer it any longer. “Thank you Stephen McDougle Media House Photography Production, you inspired me to finally clean my fridge. Let me post some images of it as a part of the #instagramcleanfridgechallenge.”

Well, that was my cynical me. In fact, two fellow wildlife photographers really inspired me with their badger images. The wonderful Morten Hilmer shared a video of himself roaming his local forest and searching for badger dens. And Kevin Winterhoff had a short educational piece about how to identify it. I really like both photographers, because they show what wonderful experiences you can make in your own backyard and just around the corner. It’s easy to fall in love with wildlife photography in Svalbard, Patagonia or the Amur region, but if you can do it on a cold, rainy night in Stoke, this is quite a feat.

I did not actively head out to find a den later-on. But it somehow resonated with me. Then, under the Corona-lockdown in Germany, I decided to skip the overcrowded parts of my local forests and to discover some terra incognita in the nearby forests. I thought, I knew the woods around my hometown really well, but I was absolutely surprised what it had in store for me, once I left my well-trodden paths. And then I stumbled right across a badger den. I literally walked into it. It thrilled me and I decided to pay the den some visits and see if I’d see its inhabitant.

My first ever badger image.

I did. Right at my first outing, two badgers showed their noses. I did not even have to wait long. I came with the last light of day and as soon as the sun had gone down, the badger came up. One – the bigger individual, I guess the male – was quite curious, whereas the smaller only had a short sniff of fresh air.

Apropos sniff. My badger announces itself with a very cute sniffing-sound, right before it leaves its den. The first time out, I was so excited, I screwed up the photography. I missed focus a lot and the light level was so low, my images turned out soft and noisy. So, I came back. The last time I visited the den, the male badger – like clockword – came out, when the sun set, had a little walk around his den and went off for a hunt. No. 2 did not show off. In my mind, an image arose. An image of Ms. badger lying hidden in the den with a litter of baby-badgers around. I will definitely come back.


Image of the day: Dreamy buzzard by Arne Bischoff

With this image, I try something new. I showcase some single-images here. Like on my instagram, but with better image quality and accessible for everyone who does not want to “share” his or her data with Facebook, Inc.

With this image, I tried to create a bit of a dreamy atmosphere. The light was so low and the buzzard so far, it was never going to be a detailed shot anyway. So, I decided to shoot right through the tall grass. What do you think? Did my creative experiment turn out well? Or is it just kitsch?

A Common buzzard on its late perch. Image taken June 23, 10 pm (CET).

A Common buzzard on its late perch. Image taken June 23, 10 pm (CET).

Meeting a ghost by Arne Bischoff

When you meet a ghost, best be stealthy and see you do not disturb it.

A black stork with both feet in a river. (Ciconia nigra)

This is what I thought when I met this black stork in a local nature reserve. It was fishing in a little river between old trees in a small stretch of Riparian forest - only about 25 metres from both shores.

But this is where the shy creature feels most comfortable. Sadly the black stork has become a very endangered species in Germany. It prefers old forests with running rivers next to wet- or open lands, but this combination has become quite scarce in the small sectioned agricultural landscapes of Central Europe. A lot of old Riparian forest has been destroyed by man. And even where such woodland still exist, it might be too small to provide enough food and space and shelter for nesting.

A close sibling: The white stork (Ciconia ciconia)

Unlike its close sibling, the white stork, the black stork is really sensitive to disturbances, which often causes it to abandon its breeding efforts when people come close. Even 200 metres to a nest might be too close.

I literally ran into this stork when it was fishing right next to a hiking path though. What’s more, this particular spot was only a few hundred metres from where both river and hiking path was to meet the next street. So this was a really daring stork you might think. Then again, it was really early in the morning and the stork might have learned that most humans sleep longer. However. We met and I had this split second to grab the shot. I was so excited about the moment that I clipped the poor storks feet. I hope the dreamy quality of the out-of-focus grassy foreground make amends. Just two frames later, the stork had left.

I hope it came back later to catch some more fish.

Three months with a Fringer. A field-report. by Arne Bischoff

Please note: This text have been originally published at fujirumors.com.

Let me get this out of the way first: this is not a review, I did no objective testing and measuring. This is a subjective report about my personal experience after using the Fringer EF-X adapter (firmware v. 1.30 and 1.40) to pair my Fujifilm cameras with the a Canon EF 500 mm f/4L IS II USM for three months and around 7,000 shots. I did not use other cameras or Canon lenses. I used the X-T3 for the majority of shots but tried the X-H1 for a side-by-side comparison. I will not focus on lens or cameras too much, since they are tested elsewhere, but I will try to assess the performance of the combination as a whole. What is correct for me, might not apply to you though.

Fujifilm X-H1 + Fringer EF-FX Pro II + Canon EF 500 mm f/4L IS II USM and Huga Nature Lens Cover.

Let’s dive right into it with the most important takeaways first.

  • Good build quality (adapter)

  • No weather sealing (adapter)

  • Good overall focussing, but worse than with native lens/camera-combination, especially in difficult conditions

  • Usable, but less capable tracking compared to native lens/camera-combination

  • Impeccable image quality


Build quality
The Fringer ships in a stylish black box. Everything seems well thought-out and high-quality. I returned my first copy anyway. The adapter features a lining of black fabric on the inner side to control stray light. With my first copy this fabric overlapped into the imaging circle of the adapter.

The aperture ring turns firmly but smoothly and feels comfortable, but I chose to set the aperture with the command dial. The aperture ring sits right next to the camera and it turned out really difficult to reach with either hand. While my right hand is holding the camera grip, my left hand is balancing the lens and operating its focus ring way out front, so I simply have no finger left to spin the aperture ring of the Fringer.

Both bayonets are made of brass and feel very solid. Once attached, there is quite a bit of play as usual with Fujifilm equipment. But overall the adapter is really well built.

There is one serious caveat though. The adapter is not weather sealed. I reached out to Fringer and they confirmed this. For wildlife photography this is a serious drawback. Demanding weather, especially falling snow, oft create the most beautiful images. I tried to amend this a little (!) by taping the joint between lens and adapter with some layers of Tragopan self-adhesive Camo Tape and put a HUGA Nature neoprene lens cover over it. I perfectly know that this is not a waterproof solution so don’t be too picky about my DIY. By the way, I highly recommend the HUGA cover and actually prefer it over the Lens Coat offerings, being roughly half the price for the same quality.

Fujifilm X-T3 + Fringer EF-FX Pro II + Canon EF 500 mm f/4L IS II USM and Huga Nature Lens Cover.

X-T3 vs. X-H1
I used both cameras with the grip attached, three batteries and in “Boost Mode”. The X-T3 (firmware v. 3.10 and 3.20) beats the X-H1 (firmware v. 2.01) in every regard and circumstance when it comes to focusing the Canon 500 with the Fringer. It focusses quicker and more accurately, hunts less and tracks better. With the X-H1, you’re completely depending on the centrally located phase detection points. The outer contrast detection points only make things worse. This is pretty sad. I personally like my X-H1 better for wildlife photography thanks to its perfectly silent mechanical shutter. To my eye, it renders higher ISO-values cleaner and it does a better job in balancing the heavy supertelephoto, too.

Autofocus
The most urgent question when it comes to adapters and third-party lenses. How does it focus? 

Focussing accuracy with both cameras is really good. Once the camera acquired focus, the images are tack sharp, both in single and continuous AF. From my experience, as soon as you get a positive focus lock, you can confidently fire away.

My Frankencamera in the wetlands.

Focussing speed is a more difficult story. In single AF and good light, the X-T3 achieves sharp focus without any noticeably delay. Continuous AF slows things down, but not too much. In lesser light, heavily backlit situations or with busier backgrounds, the combination is prone to hunting in both AFS and even more so AFC. It then takes noticeably longer to acquire focus than with my Fujinon XF 100-400. The X-H1 is inferior in every of those scenarios.
The focus preset buttons of the Canon lens are helping a lot to mitigate this problem and its manual focus override is infinitely more usable and accurate than with my Fujinon lenses. It has a very precise focus throw. For busy backgrounds, I use this workaround a lot and help the autofocus to get a little closer before it locks in by itself. Unfortunately, the Canon focusses counterclockwise to infinity, while my binoculars (the most important piece of kit in my bag) focusses clockwise to infinity. This drives me nuts!

Focus tracking: Maybe you know the impressive Fringer tracking videos on youtube. They are both a true and untrue representation of my own experiences. If you’re tracking birds in flight against the sky, the results are pretty great. The initial lock takes longer than with native Fujinon lenses but remains perfectly usable. Focus-lock and -tracking against busy backgrounds are less impressive. You best configure your camera in a way that it sticks to its initial subject and ignores obstacles. Gladly Fujifilm cameras allow for a really sophisticated AF setup. But be prepared that your AF locks noticeably slower and loses track more often than you’re used to with native lenses and you would like.

My Frankencamera in the snowy mounatins.

Keeper rate: I do not methodically assess my keeper rate. I have to trust my guts with this. I don’t use the FujfilmFringerCanon long enough to have a representative statistical sample anyway. What I can say is this: My keeper rate with the Fringer-adapted Canon lens is definitely lower than with the native Fujinon 100-400 on the same body. With the 100-400 I rarely have shots completely out of focus, and I’d consider about 70 % as usable in terms of focusing accuracy. With the adapter and the Canon attached to the X-T3, I am down to about 50 % keepers with a higher number of completely out of focus images. 

Image stabilization
The adapter transmits all signals between body and lens, so whatever stabilization you choose works. Canon claims four stops of image stabilization, which is one stop less than Fujifilm does for the Fujinon 100-400. It is worth noting that the IBIS of the X-H1 and the lens-based stabilization of the Canon lens seem to fight each other in some occasions, something I never noticed with the Fujinon 100-400 and the X-H1. I achieved the most consistent results when I used either IBIS or lens-based stabilization, with the latter being more effective due to the high leverage of the long lens. The combination of IBIS and IS sometimes worked perfectly fine and sometimes produced washed out images. I don’t have a clue when and why. The combination as a whole is perfectly hand-holdable with a decent enough hand-holding technique. Sadly, the Canon IS is pretty loud.

The combination provides impeccable image quality.

Image quality
It seems a bit odd to include, since IQ is not a property of the adapter, but this is what it’s all about, right? The image quality is absolutely outstanding. Even in great light, the 100-400 does not come close. The Canon is absolutely superior in terms of sharpness, falloff, background rendition and delivers so much more detail. In poor light, the difference is even more noticeable, especially when you’re recovering underexposed parts of the image in post. The Canon is less punchy in terms of contrast and saturation than my Fujinon. This is easily fixed in post but worth noting for jpg-shooters, who might feel better off using the Velvia simulation.
I am comparing apples and pears, you say? I am comparing long lens options for Fujifilm, I say.

EXIF
Perfect communication between lens and camera through the Fringer.

Summary
Would I do it again? Yes. Image quality and background separation are outstanding and the lens gathering twice the light means more shooting in twilight. The AF works good in most situations. The lack of weather sealing and the inferior AF tracking in low light and with buys backgrounds are real drawbacks. But overall, I really enjoy my Frankencamera. One serious downside of such a hefty lens is the public attention you get. Be prepared that everyone feels inclined to drop a comment.

Beautiful color, contrast and sharpness.

Why all this fuss?
I use Fujifilm equipment since 2017 after switching from a Sony/Minolta system. The Fujinon 100-400 has been my constant companion ever since. It will keep its place in my bag. Although I have been really happy with the lens so far, there are some inherent limitations:

Aperture: When shooting birds, you use fast shutter speeds. When my subject is perched and steady, I can drop my shutter speed, but as soon as it moves, I usually need 1/1600 sec. or faster. In anything but direct sunlight the f/5.6 aperture means that I am shooting ISO 1600 or higher. In twilight, when a lot of animals are most active, we’re speaking ISO 3200 and above.

Reach: A full frame equivalent of 600 mm should be enough for anyone, right? Well, no! Birds are a very small and often far away subject matter. In a region as densely populated and with so much agriculture as Central Europe, wildlife is shy, elusive and distant. Fitting the 1.4x TC is no solution either as it drops your max. aperture to f/8 and puts your ISO through the roof.

Image quality: Don’t get me wrong. I find the quality of the X-Trans sensors quite fantastic. However, when you’re shooting high ISO and low light, you don’t get a lot of detail. The noise pattern is well controlled, but the noise is smushing all the beautiful detail in feather and fur that us wildlife photographers are loving so much. On the long end, the 100-400 is visibly lacking sharpness compared to most telephoto primes and cropping costs additional detail as fellow wildlife photographer Steve Perry explains in this helpful video

Please listen, Fujifilm
The Fujifilm platform is not only an absolute joy to use, it meets a lot of requirements of wildlife photographers. Quick and easy to manipulate, snappy AF, well tracking, decent weather sealing, reach-advantages of the APS-C sensor, high burst-rate. What is lacking is the lenses. The 200 mm f/2 does not offer enough reach for most wildlife work, even with the 1.4x TC attached and Fujifilm does not (yet?) offer a 2x TC for it, for the 100-400 see above and this is pretty much it.

So please Fuji: Allow me for a little bit of wishful thinking. A 335 mm f/2.8 or a 400 mm f/4 would suit your system very, very well.

And in the process, please let me set my AE-L-button to “Single Point”- and my AF-L/AF-ON-button to “Zone” -focussing. This would make everything so much faster. So much faster! Sony does it, Nikon does it – you can do it, too!